A couple of years ago I taught the book of Revelation www.gbchs.com . During that series of messages I mentioned the possibility that the empire of the Antichrist may be the return of an Islamic Caliphate. Some of this information came from a book written by Joel Richardson titled "Antichrist, Islam's awaited Messiah ". In the book he proposes the idea that the empire of the Antichrist in the tribulation will be a revival of the Ottoman Empire which ruled a large portion of the Middle East from 1453-1921. His book presents some very good points that line up nicely with Biblical Prophecy regarding events that will take place leading up to the return of Jesus Christ to the earth. One of his proposals is that the Antichrist will come from the modern nation of Turkey.
We know from the book of Revelation that the nation of Israel will sign a 7 year contract with the Antichrist. This 7 year period of time is known as the tribulation. At the midpoint of the tribulation (3.5 years) the Antichrist will break his contract with the nation of Israel which will institute what the Bible calls the Great Tribulation. In Matthew 24 Jesus said it would be a time of trouble like the world has never seen; that if He (Jesus) does not return there would be no one left alive on the earth Matthew 24.21-22 .
Joel Richardson and I disagree about the rapture of the church. I believe the Bible clearly teach's a pre-tribulation rapture, that the church will not endure the wrath of God on the earth (the tribulation). Joel Richardson believes that the church will go through the tribulation and have to endure the wrath of God.
This post is not meant to create disagreement about the timing of the rapture. But it is my prayer that Christians will wake up to the realities that are taking place in our world today.
As before mentioned, if its true that the Antichrist will arise from Turkey, then it is interesting that Erdogan, the current leader of Turkey has expressed interest with normalizing ties with Israel seeking access to Israel's natural gas reserves. See the article here.
Also, regarding the rise of an Islamic Caliphate what ISIS is trying to do may serve as a precursor of things to come. See Joel Richardson's article here.
We as believer's in Jesus Christ need to wake up. In Revelation 22.20 Jesus said, "Yes, I am coming quickly." That was nearly 2000 years ago. We don't know when Jesus will return for His church. But one thing we do know is that we are one day closer then we were yesterday.
Keep your head up, your redemption draws nigh.
"For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God." Ephesians 2.8
Monday, December 14, 2015
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
God in the dock.
C.S. Lewis wrote a book titled, “God in the Dock”. A quote from that book:
“The ancient man approached God (or even the gods) as the
accused person approaches his judge. For the modern man, the roles are quite
reversed. He is the judge: God is in the dock. He is quite a kindly judge; if
God should have a reasonable defense for being the god who permits war,
poverty, and disease, he is ready to listen to it. The trial may even end in
God’s acquittal. But the important thing is that man is on the bench and God is
in the dock.”
― C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics
Today it is true.
Many Christians have put God in the dock and have become the judge of
God Himself. When the Christian cannot
resolve: poverty, disease, death, war, famine, sexual unions or any other
“controversial” topic in the Bible, God gets put on trial. If a person’s view on these matters does not
fit what they think it should be they inadvertently or on purpose become the
judge and enter into the realm where only God belongs.
There is a disturbing trend today in the church to
re-interpret the Word of God. This
re-interpretation is present because people cannot resolve how a “God of Love”
could allow war, poverty, famine, etc. to exist. The question then becomes “How can a Loving
God allow: (fill in the blank)”. Or how
can a God of Love be against a certain behavior: (again, fill in the
blank)”.
So since they cannot resolve these issues they simply begin
to re-interpret and basically re-write Scripture so that it fits into their
world view. Then God is parked in the
dock and they have become the judge of God.
After all, God won’t mind. He is
a God of love. He will say, it’s ok, I
still love you. It’s all about love
right???
I think believers (if they are believers in the first place)
need to remember some facts:
1. There is a God in Heaven separate from His Creation and
you or I are not Him.
2. There is a conflict between good and evil and it’s WAY
bigger than you and me.
3. There is more to God’s character than just love, there is
also: Sovereignty, Eternal Life, Justice, Absolute Righteousness, Omnipotence,
Omnipresence, Omniscience, Immutability, and Veracity.
4. If a believer does not like or agree with these other
aspect’s of God’s character it does not change the face that they exist.
5. If person #1 believes what the Word of God states and
then is accused by person #2 of being a bigot or old fashioned or unloving;
consider that God, not person #1, is the One being accused of being a bigot or
old fashioned or unloving.
6. God’s attributes are always perfect and fair and always
have been.
7. If at any time His attributes are not perfect and fair He
would not be God.
8. His attributes of Justice and Righteousness work in
conjunction with one another. What the
Righteousness of God demands His Justice executes.
9. All of His attributes are based on His Divine will which
is revealed in His Divine written Word.
10. Therefore those who go against His Divine Word have
violated His Righteousness. They will
fall under His judgment, His justice will execute it.
11. Likewise, those who go with His Divine Word are in line
with His Righteousness. They will come
under His blessing, His justice will execute it.
So if people do not like or agree with what God states in
His Word about sexual unions or war or poverty or disease etc. they are in danger of condemnation from His
justice. Romans 1.18-32 makes this
abundantly clear.
We would all do well
to let God be God and trust His plan.
Thursday, February 6, 2014
The Fish
In the months and years after the ascension of Jesus Christ Christians became targets of persecution. To be a follower of “the way” as it was called was to invite possible arrest, torture, and death. Therefore believers at that time developed a system of identification to determine if those they met were for them or against them. This system was the picture of a fish with five Greek letters in the middle. The letters represented words which said: Jesus Christ God’s Son Savior.
Legend states that as people met in streets or other places
a person would draw one line of the fish in the sand. If the person they met drew the other line
then each knew that the other was a believer.
Today this symbol is everywhere; bumper stickers, magnets, necklaces,
bracelets, business cards websites etc..
The simple phrase, “Jesus Christ God’s Son Savior” sums up
the good news of Jesus Christ to the world.
He is the Son of God who became a man who died for the sins of the human
race and provided salvation to any who put faith in His finished work. Simple, concise, to the point; faith alone in
Christ alone.
And that is the message today. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is that simple. But people try to make it complicated. Thank God that Jesus Christ has done all that
is necessary for salvation. The only
response that a person can make is faith alone in Christ alone. Faith plus nothing. Anything added to that simple message
dishonors and discredits the Word of God, the Work of the Son, and the power of
the Holy Spirit.
Don’t take that on yourself. Just believe and relax.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Literal vs. Allegorical
I and some like me interpret the Bible literally; that is,
the Bible means what it says and it says what it means. I am discovering that a literal
interpretation of the Bible is becoming rare.
In fact a literal interpretation of God’s Word is being met with
ridicule, laughter, and in some cases anger.
I am forty nine years old so I am, statistically speaking, a
little over half way to being physically dead.
Yet in terms of Biblical history I am barely a grease spot on the floor. Yet in my short time on this earth I have
seen some disturbing changes in the way people view the Bible. More and more Pastors and the congregations
they teach are drifting away from a literal interpretation of the Bible. It is disturbing to say the least. Instead of interpreting the Bible literally
(it means what it says and says what it means) there is a tendency to “allegorize”
the Bible.
Allegory defined- “a story, play, poem, picture or other
work in which the characters and events represent particular qualities or
ideas, related to morals, religion or politics”
(http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/allegory?q=allegory)
Therefore, If there are things you don’t like (violence,
death, bloodshed etc.) you can just arrive at those conclusions that represent
your “qualities or ideas” that uphold your “morals, religion, or politics”
This type of thinking is dangerous to say the least. Below is an example of what I’m talking
about.
Another sign of the
Great Emergence in religion bears directly on our Gospel reading today, and
that is the loss of confidence in the inerrancy of Scripture. Inerrancy is a
fancy way of saying that you believe that everything in the Bible is
historically accurate, internally consistent, and infallible. Our congregation gives witness to this
shift away from belief in Biblical inerrancy when we say to one another that we
take the Bible seriously but not
literally. In other words, even
though we acknowledge that the Bible is littered with contradictions and is not
historical in the modern sense, we still trust in its authority as a divine
communication from God. But that leaves us with the question of how do we read
the Bible? If not literally or as history, then how do we make sense of an
inconsistent and ancient text to find God speaking to us today? It is a perplexing question which some find
so hard to answer that reading the Bible on their own is no longer part of
their spiritual practice.
But Jesus gave them
and us a simple reading lesson – when you are reading the Biblical text don’t
make the error of looking for historical facts or trying to resolve all the inconsistencies
and especially don’t turn it into an idol by insisting on its
infallibility. (http://www.ravenfoundation.org/blogs/religion/jesus-gives-a-reading-lesson/)
These are excerpts from a sermon preached in a church that
calls itself Christian. Don’t take my
word for it; go read the entire article at the link above.
The time has come to
take a stand for what is right and true.
The premise of the website above is that God cannot possibly
be violent. The cross was too
violent. The O.T. is too violent. The book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ is
too violent.
They cannot resolve the “violence” in the Bible “literally”
so they engage in “allegory” which
in turn fits their “qualities and ideas”
which supports their “morals, religion,
or politics”.
Is there an answer to the “violence” question in the
Bible? Absolutely, literally there is. :)
Hebrews 4.12, “For
the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword,
piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and
discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.”
2 Timothy 3:16, “All
Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for
correction, and for training in righteousness,”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)